Skip to content

Conversation

@micafer
Copy link
Contributor

@micafer micafer commented Jan 26, 2026

Revert name change in required tests

Description

Revert this change (0a37446#diff-b4c2a69650f9ac84008ad9f745859a645c9466350ffdfe5f919655039ee2e2c3L51) as it sets an incorrect name for required tests:

Status

  • done, ready for review

Checklist (tick everything that applies)

  • Code linting (required, can be done after the PR checks)
  • Documentation
  • Tests
  • ICLA (required for bigger changes)

@micafer micafer merged commit d955886 into trunk Jan 26, 2026
18 checks passed
@micafer micafer deleted the fix_tests_name branch January 26, 2026 09:27
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.34%. Comparing base (0a37446) to head (af95f8e).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on trunk.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            trunk    #2095   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.34%   83.34%           
=======================================
  Files         353      353           
  Lines       81769    81769           
  Branches     8993     8993           
=======================================
  Hits        68148    68148           
  Misses      10796    10796           
  Partials     2825     2825           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We may even keep the version-less one and drop python version in name. This way, when we bump toolchain the next time, we don't need to work around it again.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but it seems that if you use a matrix, the value of the item in the matrix will be always appended so, we should remove the matrix from the tasks

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. It seems the matrix has always only one argument and we can inline it.

If there is a real matrix, we can use an aggregation trick like https://github.com/fast/logforth/blob/7cad34bdc63a9692040143497ddbf346f5d10264/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L108-L124

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants